Zach SearcyBrand & Creative Leadership
Case studyLevel Access · 2026
← All work

One report, launched as a campaign.

In October 2026 Gartner published its first Magic Quadrant™ for Digital Accessibility Platforms and named Level Access a Leader. I built the argument and the messaging plan behind the launch, creative directed its visual system, led the submission to Gartner’s compliance review, and was part of the tiger team that shipped nine pieces on a single delivery day.

Launch artwork: the Gartner Magic Quadrant wordmark over a purple and blue grid

The moment

A first Magic Quadrant does two jobs at once. It evaluates the vendors, and it tells every buyer that the category is established enough to be evaluated. For a company that had spent 25 years in digital accessibility, the second job mattered as much as the first.

That made it easy to waste. The default is a press release, a logo on the homepage and a week of congratulatory posts. This launch was built to carry the company’s argument into the market at the moment the most people were paying attention to the category.

One argument, and the moment that answered it

AI is building an inaccessible web faster than anyone can fix it. The digital world needs an authority to define what accessible means.

That argument ends on a question: who is the authority? A company can’t answer that about itself. An analyst firm that spent a year defining what the category should deliver, and then named who delivers it, can. It was the one version of the claim we couldn’t write ourselves.

So the launch didn’t announce an award. The argument had already said the market needs an authority; the recognition said who it is. Every piece made that same move, and the plan had one rule: nothing introduces a claim the argument doesn’t already make.

“Whether a product is truly accessible, and whether organizations can show the evidence, is now a question buyers, regulators, and customers are all asking.”Mark Zablan, CEO, Level Access

The same idea runs through every public piece. The CEO’s launch quote opens with it. His letter explains why it shaped the platform. The blog is titled after it: accessibility needs an authority.

Where it sits in the narrative

The year’s messaging ran on one map: name the problem, show why the obvious fix falls short, say why us, show what we offer, and why now. Each launch moment led with one step, carried another and handed off to the next. Gartner’s job was why us, arriving after the problem had already been named.

  1. 01The problemAI is building an inaccessible web faster than anyone can fix it.CarriesNobody builds a quadrant for a category nobody struggles with. The report existing is evidence the problem is real.
  2. 02The false solutionPointing AI at the problem only gets you partway.
  3. 03Why usEvery accessibility team hits questions no tool answers. For 25 years, trusted brands have brought them to Level Access.LeadsAn outside firm named who delivers what the category should. That’s the claim a company can’t make about itself.
  4. 04What we offerThe accessibility layer above what AI builds, holding the record of where every release stands.Hands off toAnalysts grade capability, so the reader’s next question is what the product actually does.
  5. 05Why nowProof of accessibility is becoming a buyer requirement.

The other moments in the year took the other steps, so no two said the same thing at the same volume.

MomentLeads withCarriesHands off to
State of Digital Accessibility ReportThe problemThe false solutionWhy us
Gartner® Magic Quadrant™Why usThe problemWhat we offer
Level Up user conferenceWhy us, in customers’ own wordsThe problemWhat we offer
Product releasesWhat we offerThe false solutionWhy now

The research proved the problem, the quadrant and the conference answered who decides, the product showed what they decide with, and buyers asking for proof was why all of it had to happen that quarter.

One block of language, cleared once

Analyst recognition comes with strict rules about what a vendor can say, and launches usually get slowed down by clearing every asset separately. So the recognition statement was written once, approved once, and reused word for word in every asset that mentions Gartner, in every channel.

Those sentences stay plain on purpose. The argument happens around the approved block, never inside it, so each channel could be as bold as its audience allowed without reopening compliance review.

The same argument, six levels of boldness

Each channel carried the same argument at a different volume. Restraint was highest where the constraints were tightest and the reader was least willing; boldness rose as the register allowed. It’s the tier ladder from Voice Calibration, applied to a single launch.

ChannelBoldnessHow it carried the argument
Press releaseNames the stakes without flinching, but stays procedural
Email, prospect and customerDirect address, warmer. For customers, a vote of confidence in a decision they already made
Landing pageMostly descriptive, with sections that build the argument before the download
BlogNames the authority problem directly, and why AI makes it urgent
Corporate socialShort sentences, claim forward
Executive letter and videoFirst person, at the altitude of the category. The boldest claim in the set was also the safest, because it was about the market rather than the company

How the pieces fit

Everything shipped on one coordinated delivery day, built around a single hub.

  1. 01Press releaseThe record of the news, for press and analysts.
  2. 02EmailSeparate versions for prospects and for customers.
  3. 03Landing pageThe hub. Every other piece sends people here for the report.
  4. 04BlogThe full argument, for search and for sales to send.
  5. 05CEO video and letterThe why, in the CEO’s own voice, on LinkedIn.
  6. 06SocialPaid and organic, each pointing back to the hub.

The work

The live posts, embedded from LinkedIn, and the pages they point to.

What I did

  • Built the argument and the messaging map that gave this moment its job: why us, after the problem had been named.
  • Wrote the messaging plan: the approved recognition block, and how the argument flexed across six channels.
  • Led the submission to Gartner’s content compliance review, covering the recognition language, how the required disclaimer travels in short formats like subject lines and social posts, citation forms and the published graphic, with legal review alongside.
  • Creative directed the visual system. Did the research, built the creative brief and gave the creative feedback; our designer designed it.
  • Sequenced it as one of three category moments in the year’s narrative rollout.
  • Worked on the launch tiger team. A program manager ran the delivery-day coordination across executive communications, PR, web, content, email and social.

A launch like this starts with a conviction.

The argument behind it was built with the same ladder I use everywhere: strategy, audience, problem, then a conviction a competitor couldn’t say.