Zach SearcyBrand & Creative Leadership
Framework 00Before the first one
← All frameworks

Field Research

Before anyone writes a message, somebody has to go find out what people already believe. Five sources, what to pull from each, and how to tell when you've heard enough.

The problem it solves

The people writing the messaging are usually the furthest from the buyer. Marketing hears customers secondhand, through a sales recap, a win/loss summary, or a persona doc written two leaders ago.

Meanwhile the language that would make the message land gets said out loud every day. On sales calls, in support tickets, in a Reddit thread at 11pm. It disappears the second the call ends.

So the messaging gets built from the inside out. It describes the company the way the company sees itself, and buyers read it as something a vendor wrote, because a vendor did. Field research changes the order: collect what people already say, sort it, and build from the patterns.

The rule

If nobody can point to where a line came from, it probably came from a meeting.

Five sources

Each one knows something the others don't. Skip one and you'll feel it later: messaging customers love that the experts can't defend, or a claim leadership loves that no buyer has ever asked about.

SourceWhere to lookWhat to pullThe trap
Customers Interviews, recorded sales calls, onboarding calls, support tickets The words they use for the problem, the stakes, the objections they raised before buying Only talking to your happiest customers. Find the one who almost churned.
Experts Engineers, product managers, practitioners, analysts Claims you can defend, the proof underneath them, where the category is heading Mistaking jargon for language. Experts tell you what's true. Customers tell you how to say it.
Communities Reddit, LinkedIn comments, Slack groups, industry forums, review sites Unprompted complaints, workarounds, the words people use when no vendor is listening Treating the loudest thread as the market. Count how often something comes up across threads.
Inside the building Founders, executives, sales, customer success What leadership believes, the bet the company is making, the objection sales hears most Transcribing the strategy deck. Ask what they believe that the market doesn't believe yet.
The answers Search results, AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude Which questions buyers ask, who gets cited, what the answers say about you and your category Checking once. Answers change, so run the same questions every quarter.

What to pull

Every conversation goes into a signal library in the same shape. That's what lets a pattern show up across sources instead of living in one person's notes.

  • Their words. Verbatim. The exact phrase, never your paraphrase of it.
  • Objections. The pushback, and how it was handled when it got handled well.
  • Stakes. What goes wrong, and for whom, when the problem doesn't get solved.
  • What landed. The line that made someone lean forward on the call.
  • Alternatives. What else they considered, including doing nothing.
  • Beliefs. Anything someone said as if it were obvious. These are your conviction candidates.
  • Context. Who said it, what kind of company, and where they were in the buying process.

How much is enough

For one audience, eight to twelve customer interviews usually gets you there. Add a handful of conversations with experts and leadership, a week of reading the communities, and one full pass through the answers.

You've heard enough when you can predict the next answer before the person gives it.

The order matters. Start inside the building so you know what the company believes. Then go out to customers, communities, experts, and the answers. Then bring what you found back inside. The distance between what leadership believes and what customers say is where most of the work is.

Sorting the signal

Count across sources

One customer saying something is a quote. The same idea from customers, a Reddit thread, and your own sales team is a pattern. Patterns are what you build on.

Weight what comes up unprompted

If you had to ask about it, it matters less than the thing they brought up in the first five minutes.

Read the gap between inside and outside

What you findWhat it meansWhat to do
Leadership and customers agreeYou have proofSay it plainly and back it up with their words
Customers are ahead of the companyThe story has fallen behind the productRewrite the story from what customers already value
The company is ahead of customersEither a real bet or a blind spotFind three customers who agree before you build a message on it

The conviction is usually the thing buyers already suspect that nobody in the category has said out loud.

The answers, specifically

The fifth source is the newest and the one most teams skip. Buyers now ask search and AI tools the questions they used to ask a sales rep, and the answer they get shapes the shortlist before you're in the room.

  1. Pull the twenty questions buyers ask most, in their words, from the signal library.
  2. Run them through search and two or three AI answer engines.
  3. Log who gets cited, what the answer says, and whether you show up at all.
  4. Compare the answer's language to your customers' language. Where they match and you're missing, you have a page to write. Where the answer gets you wrong, you have a page to fix.

The language that wins in the answers tends to be the language that shows up most often across sources, which is usually the language your customers already use. Field research and answer engine work end up being the same job.

The full playbook, from baseline to outreach, is in Zero-Click Visibility.

How to know it's working

  • Sales starts using lines from the messaging before anyone asks them to.
  • Customers repeat the messaging back to you on calls.
  • Review rounds get shorter, because the debate is about evidence instead of taste.
  • You start showing up in the answers for the questions your buyers actually ask.

Where this sits

This is step 00, before the series starts. It doesn't produce a message. It produces the material every framework after it builds from.

FrameworkWhat this one gives itWhat it gives back
01 · Messaging ArchitectureConviction candidates and the verbatim language to support themA structure that decides which signal becomes the message
02 · Voice CalibrationHow buyers actually talkA register to write it in
03 · Bookmark-WorthyThe questions people keep asking, which are the topics worth savingA bar for which findings become content
06 · AI OperationsTranscripts, threads, and answers to processA pipeline that keeps the signal library current

Every framework after this one assumes somebody went and asked.

Messaging Architecture takes what the field turned up and ladders it from corporate strategy down to feature-level language, conviction first.